“At Mastodon, we present a vision of social media that cannot be bought and owned by any billionaire. Your ability to communicate online should not be at the whims of a single commercial company!”
I joined about a month ago in December and it took about a week to get some of my post removed, check out the post headings.
I appealed,
No reversal.
When I first joined I noticed a lot of (Twitter/X users) ranting about Twitter and anti Trump stuff. I figured no problem, everyone has a opinion. Looks a lot like Flipboard, a lot of left leaning news post. I also post there but never no problems.
“Mastodon was created by Eugen Rochko and announced on Hacker News in October 2016,[9] and gained significant adoption in 2022 in the wake of Twitter’s acquisition by Elon Musk.[10][11][12]“, which I didn’t look up till now, don’t think it would have mattered though. still would have given it a shot.
“As Twitter users fret over the direction that new owner Elon Musk is taking the company, masses of users have hopped over to Mastodon, an open-source Twitter alternative. The news that Twitter is rebranding to ‘X’, a change already live on the website, spurred a surge in usage numbers for the open-source rival.
Since October 27, when the SpaceX and Tesla CEO formalized his Twitter takeover, Mastodon has gained 2.1M monthly active users. But what is Mastodon, and should we all be getting our accounts set up?
If you’re a Twitter purist who likes to use basic functionality like private DMing, quote-tweeting and user-friendly onboarding, Mastodon might not be for you. But if you’re looking to try something new on the social internet, then why not give Mastodon a whirl? Elon Musk isn’t there!”
Anyway on Jan 26th they suspended my account, again check out the post headlines.
I appealed,
The result,
Just wanted to share, besides the government and all the other news, censorship is still alive and well.
James Goldston. Photo: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg via Getty Images
“The House’s Jan. 6 committee has turned to a renowned former network news executive to hone a mountain of explosive material into a captivating multimedia presentation for a prime-time hearing Thursday,” Axios reports.
The hearing — the first of a series by the committee (most will be during daytime) — has the makings of a national event:
At least two of the broadcast networks will interrupt evening programming for live coverage anchored by ABC’s David Muir and CBS’ Norah O’Donnell. NBC will announce plans soon.
The other side: Republicans will argue that the 1/6 committee — which consists of seven Democrats plus Republicans Liz Cheney of Wyoming and Adam Kinzinger of Illinois — is just out to get former President Trump.
The House of Representatives’ January 6 Committee is going into full propaganda mode this Thursday.
As the hearings begin, Glenn explains how the Committee has made sure to make them into a primetime, made-for-TV night to remember, filled with shock, scandal, and suspense.
And in order to guarantee that Americans get the narrative, the Committee has enlisted former ABC News chief James Goldston to produce the special.
Strangely enough, Glenn points out, that’s the same James Goldston who buried the Jeffrey Epstein scandal when it broke. What are the odds..?
The Jan. 6 committee hearing announced the date and time of its second hearing of its June series, and it’s ditching prime time for the second round.
While the first Jan. 6 hearing will be a prime-time spectacle at 8 p.m. on Thursday, the committee announced Monday that the second will be at 10 a.m. next Monday morning during normal committee hours. While the first hearing will be broadcast live by major television networks, it’s unlikely the second will get the same treatment.
I’ve’ been thinking didn’t the Democrat’s in the 2018 midterms promising not to focus so much on impeachment and investigations and instead trying to work with the President when they could and bring people together and that people where tired of the fighting and wanted peace.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi held a press conference on Capitol Hill Wednesday, hours after Democrats recaptured the House in the midterm elections Tuesday night.
Pelosi discussed the gains in the House and in Democratic governorship’s, and called the day after the election was,
“great day for America” and a chance to “restore the health of our democracy.” She pledged to find “bipartisanship” and “common ground where we can.”
House Democrats concluded a conference call about their strategy moving forward in the wake of Robert Mueller’s explosive report.
According to NBC News Capitol Hill Reporter Leigh Ann Caldwell, Democratic leadership were open to more investigations but aren’t ready for the impeachment question.
Following Democrats winning a majority in the House of Representatives, Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) discusses her call with President Trump after the election and whether Democrats will move to impeach him.(about the 6:33 minute mark she talks about impeachment)
A victorious Nancy Pelosi on Tuesday said Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives will use their newly won majority to pursue a bipartisan agenda for the country and work for “solutions that bring us together.”
“People say, ‘You changed your mind.’ I didn’t change my mind,” says Nancy Pelosi. This is true. Democrats have been impeaching President Trump since day one.
To impeach does not just mean our constitutional process to remove a president for high crimes and misdemeanors, or, in this case, Democrats kowtowing to a radical base to jam through proceedings before their case falls apart. To impeach also means “to cast doubt on.”
And that is exactly what Democrats and their allies in the media have done since Nov. 9, 2016. Accepting the fact they all got it so wrong would require painful self-reflection. It is much easier to divert,
Now they are pushing the same exact lie. Democrats’ 2020 Campaign Message: Not Impeachment, They Insist After the 2016 election, Democratic leaders reached an all but unanimous conclusion: To defeat President Trump in 2020, they would have to do more than condemn his offensive behavior and far-right ideology, as Hillary Clinton had done. They would need, above all, to promote a clear and exciting agenda of their own.
They took that lesson to heart in the midterm elections and afterward, capturing the House of Representatives with a focus on health care and then attempting to impress the electorate by passing legislation on matters like campaign finance reform and the minimum wage. As Democratic presidential contenders pushed campaigns built on big ideas, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi resisted a chorus of calls for impeachment, even from some of her party’s leading 2020 candidates.
Yet, that’s all they’v done for the last three and a half years. Impeach, Impeach, Impeach,”Come On Man.”
Look what President Trump has done in spite of them, Trump Accomplishments a six page report.
Wednesday night Kamala Harris lied though her teeth. She doesn’t even know here history.
Sean Hannity examines Joe Biden’s radical and dangerous agenda for America.
Last but certainty not least: After watching the last, what 3 months of America burning, chaos and destruction in the street’s all in Democrat run cities and states by the way.
Is that what you really want America? Could you imagine if the whole country where run like these cities and states? How unbelievably hard it would be to fix the country after that.
If you get a chance, you have to watch it or, re-watch it. You’ll be amazed at the similarities of the “Deep State” of then and now. It’s a 3 hour movie but well worth the time in my opinion. It’s about Jim Garrison, who as District Attorney in New Orleans made startling assertions of a widespread conspiracy and cover-up in President John F. Kennedy’s assassination.
You can rent the movie for $3.00 on YouTube Assassination of John F. Kennedy. J.F.K
His Kennedy assassination case took many turns. Johnny Carson devoted an entire “Tonight” show to interviewing Mr. Garrison and talking about his accusations of a guerrilla band, mysterious figures on the grassy knoll at Dealey Plaza in Dallas, the possibility of shots from a sewer, photographic analysis and the involvement of the Dallas police, Federal Bureau of Investigation, C.I.A., Secret Service and Texas oil millionaires.
(1 Mar 1967) New Orleans District Attorney’s office issues statement about the recent arrest of Clay Shaw in relation to President John F. Kennedy’s murder. Acting District Attorny Jim Garrison speaks to press.
For you youngsters out there, much like President Trump, Kennedy wasn’t your typical politician his election was disputed, his own party went after him, he drew large crowds at his rallies, it was believed Kennedy benefited from voter fraud. He wanted us out of wars and when his brother Robert Kennedy started sharing his plan to get out of Vietnam he was assassinated too.
On June 4, 1968, he won the all-important California primary, thereby becoming his party’s front-runner. That night, after addressing his supporters at the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles, he was shot by Sirhan Sirhan. He died the following day at the age of 42.
Some Thought’s:
Obviously they can’t actually assassinate President Trump but After you watch the movie or remember having seen it, given all we now know about the “Deep State” the FBI, the Media, Obama, the DOJ, and all the rest today, present time. Is it any wonder how they got away with it then and are you at all surprised about what there trying to do to Trump today?
Is it a “Virtual Assassination”? Because he’s not the typical politician, want’s to get out of wars, not going along with the “Status Quo”, actually keeping campaign promises .
One more thing. You think the FBI or it’s director could be corrupt?
Since the death of J. Edgar Hoover in May 1972 stories about him have continued to fascinate the American public. Initially characterized as a true American hero who spent a lifetime battling crime, his legacy during the past decade has undergone a startling transformation. Recent books, television documentaries, and television movies have promoted the idea that America’s leading crime fighter was steeped in corruption, trampled over the constitutional rights of American citizens, blackmailed members of Congress, engaged in illegal electronic surveillance activities, was himself blackmailed by the Mafia, and engaged in perverted sexual activities.
Want More Conspiracy?
Thought the mysterious death of witnesses in the movie was something? How about the surprising and untimely death of Bre Payton who was a writer for the conservative online news magazine The Federalist and a guest commentator on the Fox News Channel. And she was a rising star.
I don’t have any definitive ‘proof’ for the notion that Payton was killed because she was going to disclose some type of sensitive information against the Deep State; however, it must be said that the cause and circumstances of her death are befuddling enough for one to consider such an idea. My only intention is to explain the facts and allow you to draw your own conclusions.
How many people do you personally know who have died mysteriously?
How about in plane crashes or car wrecks?
Bizarre suicides?
People beaten to death or murdered in a hail of bullets?
And what about violent freak accidents – like separate mountain biking and skiing collisions in Aspen, Colorado? Or barbells crushing a person’s throat?
In compiling this list I have tried to find as much photographic evidence as I can, but surprisingly (or maybe not so surprisingly) these people in many cases seem to have been erased from the internet!
The following is a partial list of a large number of persons who have recently met their demise in suspicious circumstances who appear to have some connection to the Clintons. I stress partial because new additions are coming in faster than closets can be found to hide the bodies in!
Below are some other video’s and search results I came across you may enjoy or find interesting. Thank for stopping by and feel free to comment.
New Orleans D.A. Jim Garrison began an investigation into the assassination of President Kennedy in the fall of 1966, after receiving several tips from Jack Martin that a man named David Ferrie may have been involved in the assassination. The end result of Garrison’s investigation was the arrest and trial of New Orleans businessman Clay Shaw. Garrison’s key witness against Clay Shaw was Perry Russo, a twenty-five year old insurance salesman from Baton Rouge, Louisiana. During the trial, Russo testified that he had attended an “assassination party” at David Ferrie’s apartment, where Shaw, Ferrie, and Lee Harvey Oswald had discussed killing President Kennedy.
Jim Garrison (Kevin Costner) repeatedly shows the Zapruder film in court to demonstrate the impossibility of the magic bullet theory, and cement the notion of multiple gunmen out at Daley Plaza.
The first conspiracy being the one which engineered the assassination of the president; the second conspiracy being the deliberate cover-up by the Warren Commission to hide the true facts of the assassination. Shaw was acquitted in March, 1969, and the conspiracy movement was dealt a blow as Garrison’s trial was widely seen as a debacle, with many researchers denouncing Garrison as a fraud and megalomaniac. Further, as conspiracy theorist Robert Anson put it, because of Garrison, “bills in Congress asking for a new investigation were quietly shelved.” Nevertheless, the trial opened new avenues of investigations for the movement, particularly with previously unexplored New Orleans connections and links of others to Oswald.
This web site is dedicated to debunking the mass of misinformation and disinformation surrounding the murder of JFK. If you are believer in Oswald as a lone gunman, you are likely to enjoy this web site, since most of that misinformation and disinformation has come from conspiracists. But if you are a sophisticated conspiracist, you likely understand that the mass of silly nonsense in conspiracy books and documentaries does no service to the cause of truth in the assassination, and simply buries the “case for conspiracy” under layers of bunk.
The following is adapted from notes prepared by attorney Mark Zaid for a 1993 course on the Kennedy Assassination taught at Hudson Valley Community College, New York. The list has been supplemented by John McAdams, Eric Paddon, Russ Burr, and Patricia Lambert’s book False Witness. It’s a very partial account of ways in which Stone tampered with the historical record.
Great interview with liberal Harvard Law Professor and longtime Democrat Alan Dershowitz about president Trump supposed “corruption” and “collusion” accusations and the Obama photo. Click on the link below for the Video and article.
Harvard Law Professor and longtime Democrat Alan Dershowitz said he would not have campaigned for then-Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) if he knew about the future president’s photo op with Louis Farrakhan.
Farrakhan, leader of the Nation of Islam, is a “virulent anti-Semite and anti-American,” Dershowitz said on “Fox & Friends.”
( I wonder who else wouldn’t have campaigned or even voted for Obama? What would America look like today without the last 8 years of the Obama corrupt and lawless administration?
But then again what if “Crooked Hillary” would have been elected in his place?)
I really can’t believe this isn’t in the news. I didn’t watch any “Lame Stream Media” last night but whats the point? I know they wont report on it. All they do is bash Trump. It’s old and all they are doing is cementing his support among the people.
With all the revaluations on the corruption of this last administration now and during the last 8 years, the Deep State crap of the administration, the FBI and DOJ and the none coverage of it and collusion is outrages, disgusting and something you just wouldn’t think would happen in America.
The liberals, progressives need to shut the hell up, clean up their own house. They have NO creditability what so ever in my view to cast stones at anyone for anything. All they have is the race card, rumors and innuendos. They never produce facts on anything, their record of doing anything good is none non-existent , their major city’s and the states they run are failures!
I’m just sick to death of it and it seems like any intelligent or thinking person with an once of sense would be too.
So what am I talking about? What’s got me so pissed? Check it out.
They say they didn’t want to release it because they thought it might effect the election. Ya think? Politicians are corrupt no doubt for the most part. There are some good ones though too. But the democrat party has got to take the cake!
A journalist announced last week that he will publish a photograph of then-Illinois Sen. Barack Obama (D) and Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan that he took in 2005 at a Congressional Black Caucus meeting, but did not make public because he believed it would have “made a difference” to Obama’s political future.
Sen. Barack Obama (D) and Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan
The photographer, Askia Muhammad, told the Trice Edney News Wire that he “gave the picture up at the time and basically swore secrecy.”
A new photo has emerged that shows former President Barack Obama posing with Louis Farrakhan, the leader of the black nationalist hate group Nation of Islam.
The photo shows then Democratic Illinois Sen. Barack Obama smiling with Farrakhan at a Congressional Black Caucus meeting in 2005. Farrakhan is known for embracing radically anti-Semitic and anti-white views, as even the left-wing Southern Poverty Law Center has acknowledged.
A photograph of then-Senator Barack Obama (D-IL) and Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan that was taken in 2005 at a meeting of the Congressional Black Caucus in Washington, DC, was released Saturday after a 13-year cover-up to protect Obama’s political career.
Journalist Askia Muhammad told TriceEdneyWire.com that he took the photograph after Obama had engaged “in a warm conversation with constituent and fellow Chicagoan Minister Louis Farrakhan.” However, he realized that the photograph could endanger Obama’s presidential ambitions, which were already being widely discussed.
Can there be any doubt this guy was and is a muslim sympathizer, a racist as many have claimed for years?
This guy is a traitor, a criminal a lier and and should be in prison along with the rest of his accomplices and administration and go down in history as the worst president in American history.
Well, that’s my two cents. As always God bless America and you. #MAGA, Drain the swamp!
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107.
Roberts Thoughts 2 