Tag Archives: Liberalism

General Flynn. Liberal hypocrisy and the lonney tunes on the left.

The libs are losing their minds and are probably going to have a nervous breakdown before these four years are up. No one in thier right mind or anyone with an ounce of common sense can deny these people are on a mission to utterly destroy President Trump and sabotage anything he tries to do, or has it has been called a “Political Jihad”.

This is a pretty good article from The American Thinker about the hypocrisy I just read and shared.

“Besides the Department of Justice, the Central Intelligence Agency, and perhaps former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn himself, the latest name to emerge in the spreading swamp of connivers who did Flynn in this week is none other than the Obama administration’s former National Security Council Deputy Advisor for Strategic Communications, Ben Rhodes.”

“Glenn Greenwald has pointed out that Democrats have made it an ugly “narrative” (Rhodes’ specialty) to accuse anyone who speaks with the Russians as a Kremlin agent, and he cited the hypocrisy of Bill Clinton’s still-unexplained visit to Moscow during his student days. The left and its media minions, led by Rhodes, have seized on the idea of talking with the Russians as somehow dangerous, treasonous, and absolutely beyond the pale.

It’s the height of hypocrisy that Rhodes, Mister Dialogue himself, to now take to plotting political ruin for anyone caught in ‘dialogue’ with the Russians. Apparently, dialogue with America’s enemies and rivals is only acceptable … if Rhodes does it.” Read more here. The Hypocrisy of Ben Rhodes

All the talk about “Fake News” check out what the Dem’s fell for if you haven’t heard yet. From The American Thinker again.

“Democratic Reps. Nancy Leosi and Elijah Cummings issued statements calling for an investigation into the activities of former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, citing a tweet that suggested  other people were involved in the incident. The New York Times also cited the tweet in their reporting.

The problem for Pelosi, Cummings, and the Times is that the tweet originated on a fake Michael Flynn Twitter account.”  Read more here. Reps. Pelosi, Cummings, and NY Times all fall for tweet from fake Flynn account

Here’s a collection of some great interviews I watched last night. Don’t get me wrong Flynn was stupid and the President was right for firing him but there’s a much bigger problem here and the lib’s are behind it all.

Kellyanne Conway Weighs on Micheal Flynn Resignation & The Media – Hannity

Brit Hume: Trump seeing resistance from inside and outside

Attacking The Trump Administration – Hannity

I posted a video from Dave Rubin a couple days ago on social media, you can check it out here. “WHY I LEFT THE LEFT” and Tucker Carlson interviewed him on his show last night. Even the left has had it with the left.

It’s being reported that Obama is behind a lot of this crap too. Here’s a few articles on it. How Obama is scheming to sabotage Trump’s presidency

Report: Obama’s Organizing for Action Is Training Army of Agitators to Sabotage Trump (Video)

Well that’s it, hope you enjoyed and maybe got a new perspective on things. God bless America and you.

04ba29c3b9f9a52f4ef96ac736fcc1ce

Obama’s Civil Rights Divisions

Excellent read!
“For the past seven years and counting the Obama administration has been engaged in a silent war on the rights of the American people at the hands of an organized network of fringe leftist lawyers working within the Civil Rights Divisions of the Department of Justice (DOJ) as well as the Department of Education (DOE). These lawyers have been unleashed under the administration to push an ideological agenda that is far outside of the American mainstream all under the banner of protecting civil rights. “

Politically Short

For the past seven years and counting the Obama administration has been engaged in a silent war on the rights of the American people at the hands of an organized network of fringe leftist lawyers working within the Civil Rights Divisions of the Department of Justice (DOJ) as well as the Department of Education (DOE). These lawyers have been unleashed under the administration to push an ideological agenda that is far outside of the American mainstream all under the banner of protecting civil rights. As noted by J. Christian Adams and Hans A. von Spakovsky of PJ Media, if a president wanted to “fundamentally transform” the nation, he would likely start with the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department because the tentacles of that Division reach into virtually every crevice of American life.

For example, Adams and Spakovsky write that “Federal statutes, under the banner of protecting civil rights, reach home…

View original post 1,573 more words

‘Stalk them and kill them,’ Farrakhan says, calling for 10,000 volunteers to KILL WHITES

“Why is this man not in jail? What is Obama waiting for?”
Why aren’t all the racebaters in jail?

crew-22312Sorry Obama you sorry ignorant fool, all speech is not protected by the first Amendment and Farrakhan’s certainly is not.

It’s Satin who bestows upon the likes of Farrakhan to spew his murderous vitriol.

While it’s certainly “Hate Speech,” what that really is being ephemeral at best, calling for wholesale death’s from blacks against whites  is no more protected  by The First Amendment, than yelling fire in a crowded auditorium. 

Perhaps Calypso Louie has not take a look at the odds  against him prevailing in a race war. 

Clearly, more mouth than brains.

Bring it and we shall come !

Farrakhan-Hate-Image-copy-2-e1334267534632

It’s time for Obama to rein in his Muslim clown and bring him before a grand jury letting the chips fall where they may. 

s-LOUIS-FARRAKHAN-RESPONSE-TO-GAY-MARRIAGE-large

Farrakhan like Obama represents the worst of America.

It’s time for the organ grinder to quit feeding his monkey.

View original post 209 more words

Requiem For An American Dream

Had to Reblog this one. Worth the read!
“What the president is doing is tearing at the very fabric of the constitution, not only with the soon to come passage of these deals, but with virtually every policy pushed under his administration. We have a separation of powers not created to protect the executive branch or the legislative branch, but to protect each and every individual American’s liberty. It was created to keep any branch from assuming so much control that they become a threat to liberty. As Turley warned, “The problem with what the president is doing is that he’s not simply posing a danger to the constitutional system, but he’s becoming the very danger the Constitution was designed to avoid. That is the concentration of power in every single branch.”

We as a country have failed to heed this warning, for we have all but forgotten that it is drastic changes such as this that have set the stage for a revolution that is sure to come.”

Politically Short

FullSizeRender

“Drastic change, under certain conditions, creates a proclivity for fanatical attitudes, united action, and spectacular manifestations of flouting and defiance; it creates an atmosphere of revolution”, wrote Eric Hoffer in The Ordeal of ChangeHoffer continues, “we are usually told that revolutions are set in motion to realize radical changes. Actually, it is drastic change which sets the stage for revolution. The revolutionary mood and temper are generated by the irritations, difficulties, hungers, and frustrations inherent in the realization of drastic change.” Whether we like it or not, our country is in the latter stages of this drastic change as an atmosphere of revolution has been deliberately forced upon us just as it was in 1773.

Benjamin Franklin described this atmosphere in his satirical essay Rules by Which a Great Empire May Be Reduced to a Small OneFranklin wrote this essay with the assumption that the minister…

View original post 1,728 more words

The real war on women. Brought to you by islam and progressive liberals.

PLEASE take the time to watch this 20 minute video. At first it looks like the typical liberal propaganda against republicans but it’s not.

We need to stop the appeasement of islam and the progressive liberal “Politically Correct” propaganda machine and call it what it is. Pure evil and a tool of satan himself. I have no words to express my rage, anger, sadness over this. Every Christian should be on their knees or in their prayers at night asking the Lord to come against this evil and rebuke the spirit behind it. Of course I’ve been aware of it in the back of my mind, (as I’m sure many are) and the use of the baloney the lib’s use to accuse the republicans of and as usual they are acutely guilty of.

This should be one the important issue the republicans should take up and a cry of every conservative. May the blood of the innocent cry out and reach the ears of the Lord.

Never forget one of the foundational principle of progressiveness is population control. They have no problem with taxpayer founded abortion and champion Planed Parenthood and the likes. Remember Sandra Fluke featured in the video along with Joe Biden supporting China’s one child policy?

Not much difference between islam and Progressives who lie, misinform, use smoke and mirrors, accuse others of what they are guilty of and to try and hide their agenda and contempt for anything God, morals and right living. It’s all their way or no way.

So take the time to watch and be discussed and maybe ashamed that we have done more to put this in the spotlight and on top of the agenda.

The REAL War On Women

Check out the rest of The Constitutional Freedom Party video’s on YouTube and check them out on Facebook and Google+1

GOD bless America and you.

Johnathan Gruber Is A Fascist

Well put and good read. Only wish the “Lame Stream Media” would cover it. They are just as complicit in the cover up and lies as Gruber, Obama and the democrats that unanimously backed and voted for it when they had compete control of congress.

Leo McNeil

Johnathan Gruber is a fascist. He’s willing to put up with a little bit of private ownership but only if the government dictates private transactions. He’s more than willing to help Congress manipulate laws in order to achieve government control. Much of the hubbub over Gruber’s comments on Obamacare manipulations put the blame on him. Make no mistake, calling the American people stupid is on Gruber. However, Gruber isn’t a politician and it’s hardly surprising when an academic with no political experience doesn’t know how to play the game. Academics aren’t nearly as smart as they or the left think they are. All Gruber did was explain how he manipulated Obamacare’s numbers so that Congress could lie to the American voters. Congress did the lying, Gruber wanted the fascist Obamacare law to pass.

Gruber’s support of fascism extends over to Medicare. Make no mistake, Medicare itself is a massive socialist…

View original post 558 more words

Wow. What an article. From a lib no less.” Confessions of a Public Defender”

I read this this morning. Originally fond it from going through my e-mail. As anyone that follows me know I’m constancy trying to get caught up,( with no success) on my e-mails with a average in-box level of 1,000 or more. To many news letters, I am unsubscribing to now. I found this one from,  WesternJournalism.com

The source article. “Shocking: Media Provides Cover Up For Criminals”

“Blacks are only a small percentage of our community, (but) the courthouse is filled with them,” says a long-serving public defender who writes under the pen name of Michael Smith in order to protect himself and his family. “The halls and gallery benches are overflowing with black defendants, families, and crime victims,” says the attorney. “For blacks, the courthouse is like a carnival…they all seem to know each other…hundreds and hundreds each day, gossiping, laughing loudly, waving and crowding the halls.”

 

Read more at, Shocking: Media Provides Cover Up For Criminals But this article just doesn’t do justest to the original article and flies in the face of what Eric Holder, the progressive movement and the “Lame stream Media” would have you believe.

I’ve worked with public for around 17 years before having to retire. When you do this like for example a police officer or the author of this article or honestly any public sector worker,(If they where honest. No matter the race.) you come to conclusion’s basted on experience. Call it profiling, racism what ever you like but it’s a truth!

Normally I share article’s I find and provide a link in hopes you click the link and read the article. In this case though I’ve copied the whole article (because it’s that good and just rang so true to me).according to the guidelines from the website I hope.

Copyright

Articles and essays original to American Renaissance may be used on the Internet free of charge, with proper attribution (author, title, date, American Renaissance, web address). For print reproduction rights, please contact us here. We cannot offer rights to any articles that may appear on this site but that were originally published elsewhere.

There are pictures on the original article(in the brakes here) that where not copied and can be seen on the original here. Confessions of a Public Defender by Michael Smith, American Renaissance, May 9, 2014.

I really hope you take the time to read it here or from the original link.

“Confessions of a Public Defender”

Michael Smith, American Renaissance, May 9, 2014

Still liberal after all these years.

“I am a public defender in a large southern metropolitan area. Fewer than ten percent of the people in the area I serve are black but over 90 per cent of my clients are black. The remaining ten percent are mainly Hispanics but there are a few whites.

 

I have no explanation for why this is, but crime has racial patterns. Hispanics usually commit two kinds of crime: sexual assault on children and driving under the influence. Blacks commit many violent crimes but very few sex crimes. The handful of whites I see commit all kinds of crimes. In my many years as a public defender I have represented only three Asians, and one was half black.

 

As a young lawyer, I believed the official story that blacks are law abiding, intelligent, family-oriented people, but are so poor they must turn to crime to survive. Actual black behavior was a shock to me.

 

The media invariably sugarcoat black behavior. Even the news reports of the very crimes I dealt with in court were slanted. Television news intentionally leaves out unflattering facts about the accused, and sometimes omits names that are obviously black. All this rocked my liberal, tolerant beliefs, but it took me years to set aside my illusions and accept the reality of what I see every day. I have now served thousands of blacks and their families, protecting their rights and defending them in court. What follow are my observations.

 

Although blacks are only a small percentage of our community, the courthouse is filled with them: the halls and gallery benches are overflowing with black defendants, families, and crime victims. Most whites with business in court arrive quietly, dress appropriately, and keep their heads down. They get in and get out–if they can–as fast as they can. For blacks, the courthouse is like a carnival. They all seem to know each other: hundreds and hundreds each day, gossiping, laughing loudly, waving, and crowding the halls.

 

When I am appointed to represent a client I introduce myself and explain that I am his lawyer. I explain the court process and my role in it, and I ask the client some basic questions about himself. At this stage, I can tell with great accuracy how people will react. Hispanics are extremely polite and deferential. An Hispanic will never call me by my first name and will answer my questions directly and with appropriate respect for my position. Whites are similarly respectful.

 

A black man will never call me Mr. Smith; I am always “Mike.” It is not unusual for a 19-year-old black to refer to me as “dog.” A black may mumble complaints about everything I say, and roll his eyes when I politely interrupt so I can continue with my explanation. Also, everything I say to blacks must be at about the third-grade level. If I slip and use adult language, they get angry because they think I am flaunting my superiority.

 

At the early stages of a case, I explain the process to my clients. I often do not yet have the information in the police reports. Blacks are unable to understand that I do not yet have answers to all of their questions, but that I will by a certain date. They live in the here and the now and are unable to wait for anything. Usually, by the second meeting with the client I have most of the police reports and understand their case.

 

PublicDefender

 

Unlike people of other races, blacks never see their lawyer as someone who is there to help them. I am a part of the system against which they are waging war. They often explode with anger at me and are quick to blame me for anything that goes wrong in their case.

 

Black men often try to trip me up and challenge my knowledge of the law or the facts of the case. I appreciate sincere questions about the elements of the offense or the sentencing guidelines, but blacks ask questions to test me. Unfortunately, they are almost always wrong in their reading, or understanding, of the law, and this can cause friction. I may repeatedly explain the law, and provide copies of the statute showing, for example, why my client must serve six years if convicted, but he continues to believe that a hand-written note from his “cellie” is controlling law.

 

The cellie who knows the law.

The cellie who knows the law.

The risks of trial

 

The Constitution allows a defendant to make three crucial decisions in his case. He decides whether to plea guilty or not guilty. He decides whether to have a bench trial or a jury trial. He decides whether he will testify or whether he will remain silent. A client who insists on testifying is almost always making a terrible mistake, but I cannot stop him.

 

Most blacks are unable to speak English well. They cannot conjugate verbs. They have a poor grasp of verb tenses. They have a limited vocabulary. They cannot speak without swearing. They often become hostile on the stand. Many, when they testify, show a complete lack of empathy and are unable to conceal a morality based on the satisfaction of immediate, base needs. This is a disaster, especially in a jury trial. Most jurors are white, and are appalled by the demeanor of uneducated, criminal blacks.

 

Prosecutors are delighted when a black defendant takes the stand. It is like shooting fish in a barrel. However, the defense usually gets to cross-examine the black victim, who is likely to make just as bad an impression on the stand as the defendant. This is an invaluable gift to the defense, because jurors may not convict a defendant—even if they think he is guilty—if they dislike the victim even more than they dislike the defendant.

 

Black witnesses can also sway the jury.

Jeantel Rachel: Blacks often make bad witnesses.

Most criminal cases do not go to trial. Often the evidence against the accused is overwhelming, and the chances of conviction are high. The defendant is better off with a plea bargain: pleading guilty to a lesser charge and getting a lighter sentence.

 

The decision to plea to a lesser charge turns on the strength of the evidence. When blacks ask the ultimate question—”Will we win at trial?”—I tell them I cannot know, but I then describe the strengths and weaknesses of our case. The weaknesses are usually obvious: There are five eyewitnesses against you. Or, you made a confession to both the detective and your grandmother. They found you in possession of a pink cell phone with a case that has rhinestones spelling the name of the victim of the robbery. There is a video of the murderer wearing the same shirt you were wearing when you were arrested, which has the words “In Da Houz” on the back, not to mention you have the same “RIP Pookie 7/4/12” tattoo on your neck as the man in the video. Etc.

 

If you tell a black man that the evidence is very harmful to his case, he will blame you. “You ain’t workin’ fo’ me.” “It like you workin’ with da State.” Every public defender hears this. The more you try to explain the evidence to a black man, the angrier he gets. It is my firm belief many black are unable to discuss the evidence against them rationally because they cannot view things from the perspective of others. They simply cannot understand how the facts in the case will appear to a jury.

 

Upset

 

This inability to see things from someone else’s perspective helps explain why there are so many black criminals. They do not understand the pain they are inflicting on others. One of my robbery clients is a good example. He and two co-defendants walked into a small store run by two young women. All three men were wearing masks. They drew handguns and ordered the women into a back room. One man beat a girl with his gun. The second man stood over the second girl while the third man emptied the cash register. All of this was on video.

 

My client was the one who beat the girl. When he asked me, “What are our chances at trial?” I said, “Not so good.” He immediately got angry, raised his voice, and accused me of working with the prosecution. I asked him how he thought a jury would react to the video. “They don’t care,” he said. I told him the jury would probably feel deeply sympathetic towards these two women and would be angry at him because of how he treated them. I asked him whether he felt bad for the women he had beaten and terrorized. He told me what I suspected—what too many blacks say about the suffering of others: “What do I care? She ain’t me. She ain’t kin. Don’t even know her.”

 

NoRemorse

 

No fathers

 

As a public defender, I have learned many things about people. One is that defendants do not have fathers. If a black even knows the name of his father, he knows of him only as a shadowy person with whom he has absolutely no ties. When a client is sentenced, I often beg for mercy on the grounds that the defendant did not have a father and never had a chance in life. I have often tracked down the man’s father–in jail–and have brought him to the sentencing hearing to testify that he never knew his son and never lifted a finger to help him. Often, this is the first time my client has ever met his father. These meetings are utterly unemotional.

 

WheresDaddy

 

Many black defendants don’t even have mothers who care about them. Many are raised by grandmothers after the state removes the children from an incompetent teenaged mother. Many of these mothers and grandmothers are mentally unstable, and are completely disconnected from the realities they face in court and in life. A 47-year-old grandmother will deny that her grandson has gang ties even though his forehead is tattooed with a gang sign or slogan. When I point this out in as kind and understanding way as I can, she screams at me. When black women start screaming, they invoke the name of Jesus and shout swear words in the same breath.

 

Black women have great faith in God, but they have a twisted understanding of His role. They do not pray for strength or courage. They pray for results: the satisfaction of immediate needs. One of my clients was a black woman who prayed in a circle with her accomplices for God’s protection from the police before they would set out to commit a robbery.

 

The mothers and grandmothers pray in the hallways–not for justice, but for acquittal. When I explain that the evidence that their beloved child murdered the shop keeper is overwhelming, and that he should accept the very fair plea bargain I have negotiated, they will tell me that he is going to trial and will “ride with the Lord.” They tell me they speak to God every day and He assures them that the young man will be acquitted.

 

Christians

 

The mothers and grandmothers do not seem to be able to imagine and understand the consequences of going to trial and losing. Some–and this is a shocking reality it took me a long time to grasp–don’t really care what happens to the client, but want to make it look as though they care. This means pounding their chests in righteous indignation, and insisting on going to trial despite terrible evidence. They refuse to listen to the one person–me–who has the knowledge to make the best recommendation. These people soon lose interest in the case, and stop showing up after about the third or fourth court date. It is then easier for me to convince the client to act in his own best interests and accept a plea agreement.

 

Part of the problem is that underclass black women begin having babies at age 15. They continue to have babies, with different black men, until they have had five or six. These women do not go to school. They do not work. They are not ashamed to live on public money. They plan their entire lives around the expectation that they will always get free money and never have to work. I do not see this among whites, Hispanics, or any other people.

 

The black men who become my clients also do not work. They get social security disability payments for a mental defect or for a vague and invisible physical ailment. They do not pay for anything: not for housing (Grandma lives on welfare and he lives with her), not for food (Grandma and the baby-momma share with him), and not for child support. When I learn that my 19-year-old defendant does not work or go to school, I ask, “What do you do all day?” He smiles. “You know, just chill.” These men live in a culture with no expectations, no demands, and no shame.

 

If you tell a black to dress properly for trial, and don’t give specific instructions, he will arrive in wildly inappropriate clothes. I represented a woman who was on trial for drugs; she wore a baseball cap with a marijuana leaf embroidered on it. I represented a man who wore a shirt that read “rules are for suckers” to his probation hearing. Our office provides suits, shirts, ties, and dresses for clients to wear for jury trials. Often, it takes a whole team of lawyers to persuade a black to wear a shirt and tie instead of gang colors.

 

Marijuana

 

From time to time the media report that although blacks are 12 percent of the population they are 40 percent of the prison population. This is supposed to be an outrage that results from unfair treatment by the criminal justice system. What the media only hint at is another staggering reality: recidivism. Black men are arrested and convicted over and over. It is typical for a black man to have five felony convictions before the age of 30. This kind of record is rare among whites and Hispanics, and probably even rarer among Asians.

 

Stats

Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

At one time our office was looking for a motto that defined our philosophy. Someone joked that it should be: “Doesn’t everyone deserve an eleventh chance?”

 

I am a liberal. I believe that those of us who are able to produce abundance have a moral duty to provide basic food, shelter, and medical care for those who cannot care for themselves. I believe we have this duty even to those who can care for themselves but don’t. This world view requires compassion and a willingness to act on it.

 

My experience has taught me that we live in a nation in which a jury is more likely to convict a black defendant who has committed a crime against a white. Even the dullest of blacks know this. There would be a lot more black-on-white crime if this were not the case.

 

However, my experience has also taught me that blacks are different by almost any measure to all other people. They cannot reason as well. They cannot communicate as well. They cannot control their impulses as well. They are a threat to all who cross their paths, black and non-black alike.

 

I do not know the solution to this problem. I do know that it is wrong to deceive the public. Whatever solutions we seek should be based on the truth rather than what we would prefer was the truth. As for myself, I will continue do my duty to protect the rights of all who need me.” 

1966857_702668539788634_55895568_n

I know, I know. I’m a racist and not “Politically Correct”./s

GOD bless America and you.

Some thought’s on Bundy Ranch.

I wonder if people understand how close this administration took us to the brink. After 6 years of an out of control government, with a undeniable record of going after it’s own citizens, Christian, patriot’s, just in general “We The People” and anyone that that doesn’t fall into lock step with them.
The constant build up and militarization of  local and state police forces,government branches that have no business being armed to the teeth. The race baiting, calling people that don’t agree with the progressive movement that’s destroying this great country “Homophobic”, “Racist”, “Islamophobic”, “terrorist”.
People are sick of it! There is a not so SILENT GIANT at time as evidenced most recently with “Bundy Ranch”, the duck man Phil Robertson controversy and Hobby Lobby. When we’v had enough and stand up together things happen.
Even thought at first for the most part the media tried to black out the Bundy Ranch stand off word got around.
Though it may have seemed or looked like there where only a little over a 1,000 or so patriot’s that mobilized and showed up. I believe there where Millions at the ready should the government actually shot someone.
For the most part I along with millions where pretty much content with watching the event unfold and were well prepared to pour into the streets to physical take back our country. But, when I saw this Post  on FB I was getting ready to pack up and make the 300 mile or so  journey up. Make no mistake it wouldn’t take much to light the fuse.
You can see it in this video at about the 24 second mark if you look closely.

10014535_514971201943001_837196787680013263_n

10152540_659040150800345_7405564310426144798_n

Look at what the left says has to say about it. Anti-government groups, right-wing politicians and gun-rights activists camped around Bundy’s ranch…”  Read more here. Nevada ranching family claims victory as government releases cattle

 

TheBlaze has the fact’s here like them or not. Is Harry Reid Involved? Seven Answers to Seven Questions You’re Probably Asking Right Now About the Nevada Rancher Situation

“It’s not about cows, it’s about freedom,” Utah resident Yonna Winget told ABC News affiliate KTNV in Las Vegas, Nevada.

“People are getting tired of the federal government having unlimited power,” Bundy’s wife, Carol Bundy told ABC News. Read more here. Breaking: Bureau of Land Management Won’t Enforce Court Order Against Bundy Cows

Some good reads. CLIVEN BUNDY V. HARRY REID

Safety concerns led to Nevada cow release, federal land managers say

Check out the video on post tooFederal agency vows to continue legal action after ending Nevada ranch standoff

As always Jim Campbell  formally of “WE The People” has a good take on Bundy Ranch,congratulations by the way Jim!

We are hoping those who are en route to the Bundy Ranch will continue. Once they are all there, it will send a resounding message to the Feds that we won’t back down. Not now, not EVER!” Read more here. The Bureau of Land Management has announced it will stop the roundup of cattle owned by rancher Cliven Bundy

Got to be somewhere later today so kept it short. In the mean time stay strong patriots. GOD bless you and America.10171921_1457346371167950_4867315303217951037_n10155445_10202283438745495_586814025_n02733-untitled252892529

 

 

 

 

Pentagon OKs beards, turbans and religious body art for some soldiers

This B.S. you know who this is meant to benefit given Obamas sympathy toward islam and muslims. No problem at all with it in regards to chaplains and the rest in the performance of their duties. We are a nation of religious freedom, supposed to be any ways.
The ARMY, the Marines and the rest are ONE! Not a rag tag band of misfits. This is the ways it is and always should be.
The Military should NOT be another social experiment for the progressives liberals.
As many hail it as a good thing, Of course right of the back they attack the Christian and or afraid of Christians being able to share their religion or beliefs.

The Unified Field Theory of Modern Liberalism

YouViewed/Editorial

Modern Liberalism Explained By Evan Sayet

 

 

 

   This man explains liberalism as it exists in it’s present form . The above video is the condensed version of his speech . Below is the entire speech for those who’s interest is piqued .

 

 

 

Published on Jan 8, 2014

” According to David Horowitz, Mr. Sayet is, “simply the best political comedian working in America today”, and a more serious thinker. In the latter capacity, Evan delivered the speech to the Heritage Foundation which Andrew Breitbart called “one of the five most important conservative speeches ever given,” a lecture that is now by far the single most viewed talk in their history. Evan has written and/or produced in just about every medium there is, including TV’s “Politically Incorrect with Bill Maher” (for which he apologizes), the multiple festival award-winning documentary “Dodo” and authored The Kindergarden of…

View original post 53 more words