Tag Archives: politics

Updated: ICYMI, Nuclear war is hazardous to you’re health.

Russia kept telling us it was going into Ukraine. No one did anything to stop them or take them at their word till after they moved.

Russia keeps telling us that they are serious about going nuclear. Still the world “leaders” ignores them. They have no worries. They can get to bunkers. America is pumping BILLIONS of military aid into Ukraine while ignoring her own problems and people.

As I have blogged before I was a Pershing missile crewman in Europe when I was in the Army. It takes about 29 minutes for a nuke to get to it’s target.

We drilled with live warheads a few time a year on a mountain top. Most of the other time we where in the field drilling with the missiles. One of the scariest times in my life was when we where in the field and a alert was called and we had to head back to pick up live warheads because China had crossed into Russia.

After getting back and waiting around for about a half hour they told us it was a drill and head back out to the field. Think about what that drive and waiting around was like, all the things running though you’re mind.

Now check out these videos and think about it.

Nuclear blasts, preserved on film

Beginning in 1945, and until atmospheric nuclear testing was banned, the United States conducted 210 above-ground nuclear tests, documented on film.

Now, footage that has survived, now being preserved by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, is being analyzed for their scientific data, changing what we previously knew about the destructive power of our nuclear arsenal. David Martin reports.

5 Largest Nuclear Tests Caught On Camera

Russia releases previously classified 1961 footage of largest ever nuclear explosion

Russia has released previously classified footage of the world’s largest nuclear explosion, caused when the Soviet Union detonated the so-called Tsar Bomba almost 60 years ago.

The hydrogen bomb, which carried the force of 50 million tons of conventional explosives, was detonated in a test on Oct.1961, 4,000 meters over the remote Novaya Zemlya archipelago above the Arctic Circle.

The footage shows an immense fireball and a 60-km high mushroom cloud rising after the explosion lit up the sky. The views were captured from several angles by cameras installed on the ground and on board two Soviet aircraft.

What Will Happen If New York City Gets Nuked Tomorrow?

May God have mercy on us and wake our so called leaders up.

Biden Wants $33 Billion More For the War in Ukraine. Which Americans Benefit?

Why Putin may be ‘MORE LIKELY’ to use nukes against Ukraine

Author and former Navy SEAL Jack Carr knows a little something about Russia. With several published thriller novels that focus on geopolitical issues, he’s certainly done his research.

So, he joins Glenn to war-game possible scenarios from the current situation in Ukraine.

He explains why Putin’s original drive to invade Ukraine may have been to grow his military; plus, Carr explains the reason why Putin may be ‘a little more likely’ to use nukes: ‘[Russia is] an animal in a corner and it’s fight or flight…they’re in survival.’

Russia, Russia, Russia. A different perspective. Part 2.

Please see first post for introduction, Russia, Russia, Russia. A different perspective. I am NOT a Russian sympathizer.

I’m sure you heard that YouTube Flagged “Ukraine On Fire” Documentary From 2016.

I checked it out and it’s well worth the time to watch! It’s definitely NOT what the mainstream media and our politicians are pushing.

Via-Sovren “Ukraine on Fire is a 2016 documentary that dives into the longstanding conflicts between Russia and Ukraine, including examining the U.S.’s involvement.

YouTube recently moved to remove Ukraine on Fire.

The sudden censorship of this documentary, long after its initial release and in the midst of new developments in this conflict, clearly shows mainstream media’s loyalty to special interests seeking to control the narrative about Russia and Ukraine.”

YouTube flags Oliver Stone’s Ukraine documentary

It was revealed Wednesday that YouTube had placed a warning on the 2016 documentary Ukraine on Fire by executive producer Oliver Stone. Video streaming platform Rumble then announced that the producers had uploaded the film to its site.

“BREAKING NEWS: YouTube removed @TheOliverStone’s documentary, ‘Ukraine on Fire.’ We believe the public should decide what it sees, not Google execs. We’re proud to announce the producers uploaded the film to Rumble, enabling anyone who wishes to view it,” Rumble tweeted.

Ukraine. Across its eastern border is Russia and to its west-Europe. For centuries, it has been at the center of a tug-of-war between powers seeking to control its rich lands and access to the Black Sea. 2014’s Maidan Massacre triggered a bloody uprising that ousted president Viktor Yanukovych and painted Russia as the perpetrator by Western media.

But was it?

“Ukraine on Fire” by Igor Lopatonok provides a historical perspective for the deep divisions in the region which lead to the 2004 Orange Revolution, 2014 uprisings, and the violent overthrow of democratically elected Yanukovych. Covered by Western media as a people’s revolution, it was in fact a coup d’état scripted and staged by nationalist groups and the U.S. State Department.

Investigative journalist Robert Parry reveals how U.S.-funded political NGOs and media companies have emerged since the 80s replacing the CIA in promoting America’s geopolitical agenda abroad.

You can check it out at a couple places, on sovern.media Ukraine on Fire on RED VOICE MEDIA, Ukraine On Fire – An Oliver Stone Documentary (2016) [VIDEO]

Also on Rumble, Ukraine On Fire

I found this interesting,

Oliver Stone on how the US misunderstands Putin

The Oscar-winning filmmaker spent 20 hours shooting a documentary with the Russian president, and tells the FT’s Matthew Garrahan that the western world has Vladimir Putin all wrong.

This too is worth you’re time,

Revealing Ukraine – Continued Investigations Of Crisis Following Ukraine On Fire – Oliver Stone

“Revealing Ukraine” by Igor Lopatonok continues investigations on of the ongoing Ukrainian crisis following “Ukraine on Fire”. In addition, it analyzes the current political backstage and its dangerous potential for the world.” 

Personally I think we shouldn’t be involved in it. Let Europe, Russia and Ukraine deal with it themselves. If Russia and Ukraine cant work something out some kind of truces and Russia goes after Poland and NATO then that’s a whole new ballgame.

We need to fix our own country before we try and fix others, Lord knows we got a lot of problems of our own right no. I’m tiered of the endless wars our politicians get us into, let Europe fix Europe. You know if someone attacks us Europe wouldn’t do a think to help us.

There are 25+ US-funded biolabs in Ukraine

There are 25+ US-funded biolabs in Ukraine, which if breached, would release & spread deadly pathogens to US/world.

We must take action now to prevent disaster. US/Russia/Ukraine/NATO/UN/EU must implement a ceasefire now around these labs until they’re secured & pathogens destroyed

Thanks for stopping by, as always God bless American and you!

The Filibuster. Is it raciest OR does it keep politicians in check?

Go figure, from the left it’s racist as is everything today and from the right it’s a stop gap from a one party take over of the government.

Lengthy post, so are the articles but worth the time I think if you want to be informed and make a common sense decision, in my opinion.

From the left a good article from VOX with a misrepresentation of history if you care to research the history for yourself and come to your own conclusion. Missing from the “History” is Senator Robert Byrd, “He filibustered against the 1964 Civil Rights.”

Hears some excerpts from the article, it’s actually a interesting read I thought.

“The question of what to do about the filibuster — the once-arcane Senate rule that creates a de facto 60-vote threshold for major legislation — is arguably the most important topic in Washington, DC, right now.

It is the main thing blocking Senate Democrats from approving President Joe Biden’s sweeping policy agenda on party lines; as such, it has become a subject of fierce partisan (and intraparty) dispute.”

“Prominent Democrats, including former President Barack Obama and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA),have argued that the filibuster has been a tool used by racists to protect white supremacy. In a Tuesday floor speech, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell denied this entirely — accusing Democrats of lying about history for political purposes.

“These talking points are an effort to use the terrible history of racism to justify a partisan power grab in the present,” McConnell said.”

“In 1917, the Senate finally decided to reform the filibuster, adding a provision that would allow two-thirds of senators to vote on a “cloture” motion that would end debate — interrupting an individual senator who won’t stop talking.

This provision, called Rule 22, was designed to make filibustering harder. But it actually had the opposite effect: It was now possible for a minority of senators to block bills by voting down cloture motions. This is how the filibuster works today (albeit with a three-fifths threshold for cloture rather than the original two-thirds, thanks to a 1975 reform).

The defenders of Jim Crow pioneered this new filibuster, successfully deploying it again and again to block civil rights bills. Richard Russell, a leading filibuster practitioner and staunch segregationist, said in 1949 that “nobody mentions any other legislation in connection with it.”

Two political scientists, Sarah Binder and Steven Smith, identified every bill between 1917 and 1994 that they believe died purely because of the filibuster. Among these, half were civil rights bills, including anti-lynching bills proposed in 1922 and 1935.”

Why the debate over the filibuster matters

“It’s fair to wonder why any of this matters. The mere fact that the filibuster as we know it is a “Jim Crow relic,” as Obama once put it, doesn’t necessarily say anything about whether it’s desirable to keep around today.

To understand why the history of the filibuster matters, let’s take a closer look at the arguments in favor of keeping the 60-vote threshold. Of these, the most prominent by far is that the filibuster is necessary to protect minority rights. National Review’s Dan McLaughlin made this point clearly in a recent essay:” ( Read the rest of the article here, it’s actually a interesting read.)The filibuster’s racist history, explained

Now from Mitch McConnell: 03.23.21 U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) delivered the following remarks today on the Senate floor regarding the legislative filibuster:

‘If our Democratic colleagues really believe what they’re saying, did they themselves use a racist tool against Senator Scott’s police reform bill last year? Did they use a racist relic when they delayed the CARES Act or blocked legislation to protect unborn babies who can feel pain? […] Or is our colleagues’ story that the filibuster was not an offensive relic as recently as last summer, but magically became an offensive relic the instant Democrats came to have a majority?’

“While House Democrats try to overturn a certified election result from last November, some Senate Democrats are agitating to break Senate rules to ram through a partisan rewrite of all 50 states’ election laws.

“The 60-vote threshold is the reason why huge pillars of domestic policy don’t oscillate back and forth every time a different party wins the majority.

“Think of something like the Mexico City Policy, the executive-branch policy about funding overseas abortions. It has flipped back and forth every single time the White House has changed party since the 1980s. Republican presidents issue the memo. Democratic presidents retract it.

“The legislative filibuster is what keeps the entirety of federal law from working that way.”

“For a long time, Senators on both sides have recognized the Senate and the country are better off with some stability. Both sides have understood there are no permanent majorities in American politics, so a system that gives both sides a voice benefits everyone in the long run.

“That’s what 33 of our Democratic colleagues said just a few years ago, when they all signed a joint letter insisting that rules protecting debate on legislation be preserved.

“That’s what President Biden believed consistently throughout his long Senate tenure. About 15 years ago, then-Senator Biden said killing the filibuster would be, quote, ‘an example of the arrogance of power.’ He restated his long-held position during the campaign just last year.

“Here’s what my colleague the Democratic Leader said in 2017. 

“The ‘legislative filibuster’ is ‘the most important distinction between the Senate and the House… Let’s find a way to further protect the 60-vote rule for legislation.’ End quote.

“The Democratic Leader, less than four years ago.

“And Democrats didn’t just spend the last four years supporting the filibuster; they spent four years using it!

“We could have had federal legislation on the books since last summer putting more body cameras on police officers, requiring fuller incident reporting to the FBI, and finally making lynching a federal crime. Among other things. But Democrats stopped it.

“A few months before, they used the filibuster to briefly turn the bipartisan sprint toward the CARES Act into a partisan standoff. The press marveled that Senate Democrats had the gall to block relief — a tactic that helped tank the markets — in order to demand further changes.

“And back in early 2018, Senate Democrats used the filibuster to block government funding and force a brief government shutdown over immigration. One of the Democratic Leader’s first major acts as the leader of his conference was to wield the filibuster to shut down the entire government. 

“So the Democratic side just spent four years defending and happily using the same Senate rule that many of our colleagues now attack.

“About a year ago, former President Obama launched a new, coordinated, and very obvious campaign to get liberals repeating the claim that the Senate rules are a relic of racism and bigotry. 

“That came just a month after Democrats had used the filibuster to kill Senator Tim Scott’s police reform and anti-lynching bill.

“These talking points are an effort to use the terrible history of racism to justify a partisan power grab in the present. It’s not unlike what we saw last summer when some protest mobs ended up defacing statues of people who actually crusaded for justice — like Abraham Lincoln, Ulysses S. Grant, and the abolitionist Mathias Baldwin.

“Mistakenly damaging good institutions because of our troubled past. 

“Multiple fact-checkers have torn into this simplistic notion that the rules of the Senate are rooted in racism. ( Read the rest of his remarks here, Democrats’ Filibuster Threats Aren’t About Principle, Just Raw Power

Another good read from The Hill

“On September 30, 1788, Pennsylvania became the first state to elect its United States senators, one of whom was William Maclay.  In his 1789 journal Senator Maclay wrote, “I gave my opinion in plain language that the confidence of the people was departing from us, owing to our unreasonable delays. The design of the Virginians and of the South Carolina gentlemen was to talk away the time, so that we could not get the bill passed.”

“Our Founding Fathers intended the Senate to be a continuing body that allows for open and unlimited debate and the protection of minority rights.  Senators have understood this since the Senate first convened.  

In his notes of the Constitutional Convention on June 26, 1787, James Madison recorded that the ends to be served by the Senate were “first, to protect the people against their rulers, secondly, to protect the people against the transient impressions into which they themselves might be led… They themselves, as well as a numerous body of Representatives, were liable to err also, from fickleness and passion.  A necessary fence against this danger would be to select a portion of enlightened citizens, whose limited number, and firmness might seasonably interpose against impetuous councils.”  That “fence” was the United States Senate.

During this 111th Congress in particular the minority has threatened to filibuster almost every matter proposed for Senate consideration.   I find this tactic contrary to each Senator’s duty to act in good faith.

I share the profound frustration of my constituents and colleagues as we confront this situation.  The challenges before our nation are far too grave, and too numerous, for the Senate to be rendered impotent to address them, and yet be derided for inaction by those causing the delay.

There are many suggestions as to what we should do.  I know what we must not do.

We must never, ever, tear down the only wall – the necessary fence – this nation has against the excesses of the Executive Branch and the resultant haste and tyranny of the majority.

The path to solving our problem lies in our thoroughly understanding it.  Does the difficulty reside in the construct of our rules or in the ease of circumventing them? ( Read the rest of the article here, The filibuster and its consequences (Sen. Robert Byrd)

God Bless America and you.

News and Views, ICYMI. #TRUTH.

( Editors Note: Not for Liberal Consumption. May cause brain damage.)

Not in any particular order,

Public school FORCES teachers to admit they’re racist colonizers

The only way to fix the problem that’s infecting our public schools is to demand they give power back to parents in the form of school choice.

Hunter Biden: Media handling in October vs. Now

Tom Fitton on the legal angle surrounding Hunter Biden and his father Joe Biden, the effect it has on the future of Biden’s administration and more – via Newsmax TV’s ‘Spicer & Co.’

I really liked this one, Especially the last part about Texas.

Texas’ Spirit is the American People’s Will; The Uncover Of Chinese Honeytrap Spy| Beyond The Noise

Today’s topics include discussing Hunter Biden’s tax investigation, will it really matter? What exactly is the goal in the investigation? Is it to drag Hunter down or is it just a distraction?

How has digital censorship evolved in China? How will it’s effects be used against the American people.

The discussion is important as Big Tech are pushing their censorship dial to the max! Texas may possibly be the most important state soon! Find out why in this episode of Beyond The Noise with David Zhang.

Tony Shaffer on Election Anomalies: Late Night Spikes for Biden; Curated Ballots; USPS Whistleblower

Rumble — Today, we sit down with Tony Shaffer, president of the London Center for Policy Research and a former senior intelligence officer with the Department of Defense, to discuss the research his think tank has conducted into election irregularities and vulnerabilities.

This is American Thought Leaders 🇺🇸,

The Truth Behind the Media’s Insidious Plot to Help Biden Get Elected

Rumble — With the new explosive allegations about Hunter Biden, there is no longer any question about whether the media were complicit in covering up a major story to help a political candidate.

Tucker: Potential criminal activity hidden from Americans

Tucker accuses news media of suppressing potential criminal activity by Bidens.

Ingraham: Liberal media’s effort to elect Biden exposed

Laura Ingrahm looks back at four-year battle waged by Democrats and media to drive Trump out of office.

Life, Liberty & Levin’ host joins ‘Hannity’ to discuss the federal probe into president-elect’s son

Life, Liberty & Levin’ host joins ‘Hannity’ to discuss the federal probe into president-elect’s son

Debunking the LIES About the Lawsuit Calling For Supreme Court Intervention In Georgia

Rumble — Are conservatives violating their own “states rights” doctrine in calling for Supreme Court intervention in Georgia, Pennsylvania and Michigan? Not at all.

Google’s Absurd Double Standard For Conspiracy Theories On YouTube

Western Correspondent Tristan Justice explains YouTube’s double standard when it comes to banning conspiracy theories.

Rudy Giuliani BEATS CCP-Virus | Rudy Giuliani’s Common Sense | Ep. 93

New Hunter Biden China Dealings Probe Prove Massive Media Cover-up | DIRECT MESSAGE | Rubin Report

Dave Rubin of The Rubin Report discusses the media’s sudden interest in reporting on Hunter Biden’s China dealings which are part of a criminal investigation by the FBI. It was just announced that Hunter Biden is being investigated for tax fraud and possible money laundering. Is this the same story of the Hunter Biden laptop that was discovered months ago? The one that caused the New York Post to be punished with unnecessary censorship by being locked out of it’s Twitter account for reporting on the scandal? The same story that was ignored and called misinformation and part of a Russian disinformation campaign? It turns out the truth is much more sad. It was just mainstream media manipulation suppressing the story to protect his father Joe Biden in the runup to the 2020 election. Isn’t this election interference? The same thing the media has accused others of without evidence?

I like this Blogger, he used to have a reblog button but tuck it away. Guess he didn’t like the idea, any ways check it out.

The Humor Version of Left-Wing Hypocrisy

I’ve written about how our friends on the left represent the rich, and pointed out how big parts of their agenda are designed to help people with above-average incomes.

Today, let’s have some fun with that issue.

Bernie Sanders has three houses, yet complains about the supposed excesses of capitalism. I wonder if he applies that analysis to his Mini-Me, Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez?

Here’s another one.

Electric vehicle shock treatment

Joe Biden, his fellow Democrats, and apparently big U.S. automakers, have joined the rush to transform America’s transportation to 100% electric vehicles (EV) whether We the People want it or not.

During an October town hall, Biden asserted that his plan would save “billions of gallons of oil” and help create a million auto industry jobs, in part by banning the sale or manufacture of new internal combustion (IC) engine vehicles by 2030. How this will happen in the Real World, he didn’t say.  

Supreme Court declines to hear Trump-supported Texas case over election results in four other states

“The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution,” the Supreme Court’s order reads. “Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot.”

The order does not foreclose any other pending or future election appeals at the Supreme Court, but time is running out. The states meet next week on Dec. 14 for the Electoral College exercise. And on Jan. 6 there will be a joint session of the House and Senate to count the electoral votes and certify President-elect Joe Biden as the winner.

STOP THE STEAL!

See you on the other side, 2021. God bless America, you and President Trump.

Check this out,diabolical.

Quick thought’s. Was thinking about this this morning, Think about this. America fought a bloody Civil War to free slaves, what would later be come the Democratic Party, @TheDemocrats was all in to keep people as slaves. They lost.

Later they would appose legislation to make slaves free and equal, they lost. They’v supported and have had some of the most infamous K.K.K. elected officials to their party. They opposed segregation.

What’s that saying? If you don’t learn from history, you’re doomed to repeat it. As Liberals they took over the education system and began to rewrite Americas history and began the indoctrination of our youth. Before that America had made great stride’s in fixing it’s dark history of racism and equality. America was working and Americans were for the most part getting alone and working together.

America was probably one of the only country’s in the world that had done so.

Fast track to 2008, America was tired of politics as usual and wanted change, man did we get it!

America elected it’s first “Black President”. His administration was filled with like minded people. Who can forget Attorney General Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch and Susan Rice to name a few.

Obama’s legacy will no doubt be one that set race relation back what 50 to 100 years. Set Americans against each other more then any other President in history. Not to mention the destruction of our Military and national image.

After 8 years of his Presidency America wanted change again, tired of politicians once again and elected a outsider.

The outsider would begin to turn the country around and call out the elite’s in the system and they couldn’t have that. They had almost made America what they wanted, had almost grabbed total control.

In 2020 wee are once again dived like not time in history. Not because of the outsider but because @TheDemocrats , the Liberals, Progressives, Socialist had tasted power and they are not letting go with out a fight.

In order to achieve it they are willing to light the county on fire, divide us along racial linens and have actually convinced people to want to be segregated again.

Diabolical!

Any thought’s?

God bless you and America!